Private investment hits 11-year low
Bangladesh’s private investment fell for the third consecutive year, reaching 22.03 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in the fiscal year 2024-25, the lowest level in 11 years, amid a weak investment climate and macroeconomic stress.
Public investment as a share of GDP, a measure of the final value of goods and services produced in the economy over a period, also declined for the third year due to slow implementation of the Annual Development Programme (ADP).
It stood at 6.51 percent of GDP in FY25, the lowest since at least FY13, down from 6.74 percent a year earlier, according to the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS).
Economists say that the falling investment trend indicates the creation of fewer jobs than required, especially for the growing number of young workers entering the labour market each year.
According to them, the investment decline also threatens future growth.
“It is very concerning, especially at a time when we need to accelerate investment to create employment and boost exports,” said M Masur Reaz, chairman and founder of Policy Exchange Bangladesh.
The investment-to-GDP ratio comes alongside an estimated economic growth of 3.49 percent, the lowest since the Covid year 2020, driven mainly by private consumption. The decline suggests overall investment has not kept pace with the growth of the economy.
Reaz attributed the fall in private investment to three main factors.
“Our investment environment is weak, and it was identified nearly a decade ago,” he said, citing Bangladesh’s ranking in the World Bank’s ease of doing business at 176 out of 190 economies.
“From that day, comprehensive and targeted reforms were necessary. But they were implemented in an isolated and fragmented manner.”
The economist added that investment depends on multiple factors, including licensing, policy predictability, land, energy, and trade facilitation.
The macroeconomic crisis that began to unfold from 2023 further dampened investment sentiment, he said. Weak domestic demand, import contraction caused by the dollar shortage, and political instability ahead of the election all played a role.
“Foreign investors perceive a country as high risk when a country suffers from a macroeconomic crisis,” he said, noting that uncertainty increased after the mass uprising in July 2024 that led to the ousting of the Sheikh Hasina government.
“We have seen demonstrations and unrest, and they have affected the policy environment too. The whole fiscal year 2024-25 was full of uncertainty. The declaration of the general election date came in August of this fiscal year.”
Reaz added that the recent demonstration at the Bangladesh Bank over the removal of the central bank governor could create a negative international perception, signalling fragility in decision-making and discipline.
Ashikur Rahman, principal economist at the Policy Research Institute (PRI) of Bangladesh, identified a weak business climate, infrastructure bottlenecks, and waning competitiveness in international markets as production costs rose amid supply-side constraints.
He said governance breakdown in the banking sector since around 2020 has severely distorted credit allocation.
“Instead of channelling funds toward productive small and medium-sized enterprises, the financial system became increasingly captured by entrenched economic oligarchs. Large-scale loan irregularities and weak oversight eroded confidence and crowded out genuine entrepreneurs.”
Rahman added that small and mid-sized firms, traditionally the backbone of the employment generation, found themselves sidelined from access to affordable finance.
“This created a perverse incentive structure in which politically connected borrowers benefited, while real sector innovators were marginalised.”
He added that the decline in private investment as a percentage of GDP has profound implications for the country’s economic development.
“Investment is the engine of productivity growth, job creation, and structural transformation. A sustained decline weakens the economy’s capacity to generate employment, particularly for a young and expanding labour force.”
Rahman said it also limits technological upgrading and diversification beyond traditional sectors.
“Moreover, without robust private investment, growth becomes increasingly consumption-driven and fiscally strained. This is not sustainable, especially as Bangladesh approaches LDC graduation and faces tighter external financing conditions. Weak investment today translates into slower growth tomorrow, and slower growth amplifies challenges such as unemployment, underemployment, and poverty,” he added.
Syed Akhtar Mahmood, former global lead for regulatory reforms at the World Bank Group, said the low investment rate is caused by a mix of short and long-term issues. While governments have tried to improve the investment climate, many fundamental problems remain, including regulatory hurdles and limited access to credit.
High interest rates, bank liquidity issues, and greater risk aversion have reduced the supply of credit.
“Even if investors were willing to borrow at the higher interest rates, they are not getting financing. Many investors, especially some large ones, have over-leveraged themselves by borrowing heavily when interest rates were low. These companies may not be in a position to take on large loans even if they see good investment potential,” he said.
Mahmood added that energy shortages and political uncertainty have further dampened investor confidence.
“Low investment means our production capacity is not augmented while our existing capacity is under-utilised,” he commented.
According to Mahmood, this affects both current growth and future growth prospects. It also limits technological upgrading, research and development, skills development, and new product creation, all of which are necessary to enhance productivity and diversify the economy, including exports.
“When investors are struggling to carry out even basic investments, they are unlikely to invest in things that make our economy more competitive,” he said.
Comments