Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) today told the High Court it is not responsible for Jaha Alam, who languished three years in jail for a mix-up.

It filed a report to the court this morning saying the cases against Jaha Alam was filed on basis of documents from Bangladesh Bank and Sonali Bank.

The report was filed before the bench of Justice FRM Nazmul Ahasan and Justice KM Kamrul Kader in line with a previous order in this connection.

The bench will hold hearing on the matter tomorrow, ACC lawyer Advocate Khurshid Alam Khan told reporters after submitting the report.

Jaha Alam, who was in jail for the last three years instead of the real accused in 26 corruption cases, was released from prison on February 4.

HOW JAHA ALAM LANDED IN JAIL

Between 2010 and 2011, Abu Salek, a businessman, misappropriated about Tk 18 crore from Sonali Bank's Cantonment branch. Salek used a fake address to open an account with the bank, the ACC said.

Salek also had an account in another private bank, ACC sources said.

In 2012, the anti-graft watchdog filed the 33 cases over the misappropriation, and Salek was made accused in most of them.

During investigation, the commission asked the banks' officials to identify and trace Salek.

The officials informed the ACC that the address provided by Salek in his bank documents was in Tangail's Nagarpur, ACC sources said.

The commission then summoned Salek to its office where the bank officials, including the account's introducers, were present.

However, the man who appeared before the ACC claimed that the authorities concerned were mistaken and his name was Jaha Alam, not Abu Salek.

“To ascertain further, we sent the photo that Salek used in the bank's Know-Your-Client form to Nagarpur's Union Parishad chairman, who identified him as Jaha Alam,” said an investigation officer preferring anonymity.

Later, the ACC placed a charge-sheet before the court identifying him as Abu Salek alias Jaha Alam.

In 2016, Alam was arrested by police in connection with most of the cases in which Salek was accused.

HOW JAHA ALAM'S IDENTITY WAS KNOWN

Different media outlets reported that Jaha Alam said he was wrongly accused, after which the ACC investigated the matter further.

The commission found Alam's claim to be true.

Contacted, ACC Director General Moyeedul Islam said of the 33 cases, Alam was made accused in most of them.

“We have already urged the court to exempt Jaha Alam from prosecution,” he said, adding that the process was underway.

He, however, said Salek, who was on the run, would remain as the accused in the cases.

On January 28, the HC bench passed the order in a suo moto move following a report published in the Bangla daily Prothom Alo on the day under the headline “Wrong accused in jail in 33 cases: Sir, I am Jaha Alam, not Salek.”

Supreme Court lawyer Amit Das Gupta placed the news report before the HC bench for necessary orders in this regard.

HC judges issued the summons after going through the report.

The court also gave a rule asking the authorities concerned to explain why Jaha Alam should not be acquitted of the cases in which he was not an accused, Amit told The Daily Star.

Earlier, the DG of the ACC said that the faces of Abu Salek and Jaha Alam, according to the photograph, were similar.