Gender Integration & International Criminal Court
Sultana
Razia
Gender refers to the
socially constructed differences between men and women, which are not
essential or inevitable products of biological sex differences. For more
than two decades, the term "gender" has been used in UN documents
in this sense.
In 1945, the Statutes
of the Nuremberg and Tokyo Tribunals failed to include rape under their
jurisdiction. After, that in 1946-48 when sexual violence was widespread
and when the European and Japanese Military allegedly practised sexual
slavery on a large scale, the issue of "comfort women " was
not addressed by international military tribunals.
Gradually women victims
of war crimes gained more international legal protection on paper after
World War II, but women suffered even greater violations by rapists who
escaped prosecution. Four Geneva conventions were drafted in 1949 to codify
humanitarian law. War crimes, as defined in these instruments, included
mistreatment of enemy aliens during international armed conflicts. Article
27 of the Fourth Geneva Convention to protect civilians during war states:
"Women shall be especially protected against any attack on their
honour, in particular against rape, enforced prostitution, or any form
of indecent assault." Common Article 3 of all four Geneva Conventions
applies to "armed conflict not of an international character"
and proscribes "outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating
and degrading treatment . . . at any time and in any place whatsoever..."
The UN failed to establish
a permanent international criminal tribunal to enforce the Geneva Conventions,
the 1948 Genocide Convention, or the Nuremberg precedent. U.S. courts
had jurisdiction over soldiers indicted for rape in Vietnam, but those
charges were dismissed. The U.S. military established brothels with paid
Vietnamese sex workers.
When Bangalis fought
for an independent Bangladesh in 1971, West Pakistani soldiers allegedly
raped 200,000 Bangali women. Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions
applied to that internal armed conflict, but unfortunately, no international
authority had criminal jurisdiction over those offences.
In 1977, Protocol
II to Geneva Conventions expanded on that article by expressly covering
"rape, enforced prostitution and any form of indecent assault"
in non-international conflicts.
For nearly 50 years
the issue of "Comfort women" used by the Japanese military remained
in cold storage. During the late 1980s and the 1990s, international movements
seeking trial and reparations for "comfort woman" started to
take place and addressed the issue. In 1993 Vienna World Conference on
Human Rights felt the need to address the grave violations of women's
human rights as a part of UN agenda. Later, the 4th World Conference on
Women in Beijing in 1995, adopted the platform for action to affirm 'rape'
as a war crime.
Women activists with
non governmental organisations successfully lobbied the UN for new human
rights standards on sex discrimination and sexual violence in times of
war or peace. Human rights advocates brought claims to the Inter-American
Court and the European Courts of Human Rights claiming that rape amounted
to torture in violation of regional treaties. Under the U.S. Alien Tort
Claims Act, women from Ethiopia and Bosnia brought civil actions to recover
damages for sexual attacks.
Human rights NGOs
documented mass rapes as a weapon of war in Guatemala, El Salvador, Liberia,
Kuwait and especially the former Yugoslavia. As part of an "ethnic
cleansing" strategy, Bosnian Serbs established rape camps allegedly
and deliberately impregnated Muslim women. Rapists calculated that the
children of their victims would be regarded as Serbian like the father,
and that Muslim men would then reject the Muslim woman victims of rape.
In response, women
activists made certain that the International Tribunals for the Former
Yugoslavia and Rwanda were entrusted with the responsibility of prosecuting
rape as a war crime. They pressed effectively for more women judges, prosecutors,
and court personnel.
In 1998, the Rwanda
Tribunal defined rape as a form of genocide in one of its interpretations
(Akayesu case) and the Yougoslavia Tribunal identified rape as a form
of torture in other judgements (Celebici and Furundzija judgments).
In negotiations for
a permanent International Criminal Court, the NGOs lobbied successfully
for a new language on forced pregnancy, but failed to gain formal assurance
of gender balance in the selection of judges and prosecutors. As defined
in the Statute, Crimes, against humanity would explicitly include "rape,
sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilisation,
or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity... when committed
as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against a civilian
population, with knowledge of the attack..."
Thus on July 17, 1998
"Rome Statute" of ICC was adopted by the vote of 120-7 which
codified for the first time rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution,
forced pregnancy, enforced sterilisation, sexual violence as war crimes
and for the first time in the history crime against humanity was addressed
so elaborately.
From July 1, 2002
the Interna-tional Criminal Court came into force and it is hoped that
all gender related crimes will be dealt with effectively and that the
rights of victims will be protected under its jurisdiction.
The
author is a law desk assistant in The Daily Star.