Hungarian
Courts condemn segregation of children with learning disabilities
On 7 October 2004,
in a major test case, the Budapest Metropolitan City Court of Appeals
(Fõvárosi Ítélõtábla) upheld
the first instance court decision, dated 1 June 2004, by which the Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén
County Court ordered the primary school in Tiszatarján and the
local governments of Tiszatarján and Hejõkürt respectively
to pay damages in the total amount of 3 650 000 Hungarian forints (approximately
14600 euro), with accrued interest, to nine families whose children
have been unlawfully kept in a segregated class and taught based on
a special (inferior) curriculum from 1994 to 1999, in the absence of
any prior certification declaring them mentally deficient and unable
to attend regular classes. All of the children affected, most of them
Romani, came from families with low income and social standing in the
community and have accordingly had difficulties in asserting their legal
rights and interests in the education context.
The complaint, filed
in 2001 by attorney Lilla Farkas as part of a joint strategic litigation
project undertaken by the Legal Defence Bureau for National and Ethnic
Minorities (NEKI) and the European Roma Rights Center (ERRC), was based
on the school psychologists' assessment that rather than being afforded
additional support for their learning difficulties, it was "in
the children's own best interest" to be placed in a special class
for the mentally deficient, disregarding their age, pedagogical and
psychological authority, and ultimately even the prescribed legal procedure.
Moreover, following
their segregation, the plaintiffs, otherwise pupils with normal IQs,
were taught by an unqualified student teacher and bullied by their peers
as "retarded", thus further adding to their stigmatisation.
In its judgement
of 7 October 2003, the Budapest Metropolitan City Court of Appeals concluded
that the segregation of the plaintiffs by the school and the local authorities
was in breach of the Hungarian Public Education Act.
It also stressed
that as a result of this practice the plaintiffs have suffered and will
continue to suffer profound psychological harm. In addition, the court
held that the school had clearly failed to recognise and address the
plaintiffs' learning difficulties and had instead chosen to administer
an inferior curriculum which has jeopardised their future development.
The court pointed
out that on completing their studies the plaintiffs will suffer additional
disadvantage in terms of diminished chances for further education as
well as with regard to their employment opportunities compared to their
peers schooled on the basis of the regular curriculum.
Finally, the court
concluded that the local authorities of Tiszatarján and Hejõkürt,
in their capacity as funders and supervisors of the school in question,
did not secure and maintain its lawful operation and held that this
in and of itself amounts to major negligence.
NEKI and the ERRC
welcome the ruling of the Budapest Metropolitan City Court of Appeals
as a crucial precedent establishing that segregation and stigmatisation
of children with learning difficulties is both morally unacceptable
legally untenable.
Throughout Europe,
pupils of Romani origin suffer racial discrimination in education. Their
overwhelmingly disproportionate placement in special schools or special
classes for the mentally deficient, or in other forms of substandard,
stigmatising schooling arrangements, can have no reasonable and objective
justification.
Source:
The European Roma Rights Centre.