The workers demanded a just and remunerative wage structure, better factory environment, regular payment of overtime bills, a weekly holiday, and security of service. There is no doubt that they were not asking for too much, considering the pittance that they get as salary in contrast to the rising prices of essentials. Despite the turbulence in the sector, good sense prevailed and the owners and workers could strike a deal under government supervision which promised better, but still not good enough, service conditions for the workers. But many owners have failed to give even what they had agreed to, citing reasons which sound far from convincing. For example, they have claimed that their business has been affected by the chaotic political situation prevailing in the country up until January this year. But that can by no means justify non-implementation of the agreement with the workers when garments have been a profitable sector. One can hardly overlook the fact that implementation of the agreement was not a guarantee of a decent life to the toiling men and women; it would merely have eased their struggle for survival.

Clearly, owners have failed to go by their own commitment. They have ignored an issue which is essentially humanitarian and involves a basic right of the workers.

The owners will have to bear the responsibility of anything untoward happening in the sector in the near future should they fail to implement the tripartite agreement. The government, as a party to the agreement, has already stressed the point saying action will be taken against non-compliance with the term of the agreement. The defaulting owners better pay heed.